2013 Man Booker Prize Winner Announced

October 15, 2013 | 1 book mentioned 4


Eleanor Catton has claimed the 2013 Man Booker Prize – as well as its £50,000 payout – for her second novel, The Luminaries. Catton had 11/4 odds to win this year’s prize according to popular bookmakers, Ladbrokes, and she has now become the youngest author to ever win the prestigious award. The four judges read 151 novels before deciding on Catton’s work, and chairman Robert Macfarlane estimates that the reading amounted to “about 21 kilometres of prose” at “12-pt Adobe Garamond.”

In a recent review for our site, Martha Anne Toll referred to Catton’s novel as “that rarest literary treasure, a book of such dazzling breadth and scope that it defies any label short of masterpiece.” She continued:

Deeply entrenched in New Zealand’s South Island, The Luminaries makes clear that this author commands the world at her fingertips. Her literary ancestry derives less from her homeland and more from the British and American giants of the nineteenth century. Catton deserves their company. Nodding to Melville, she’s nailed the tormented sea captain and the revenge obsessed “Chinaman.” With so many characters taking on false identities and trying to out-cheat each other in New Zealand’s gold rush, Catton, too, has mined the seamy underside of greed and poverty so beloved by Dickens. Like George Eliot, Catton looks behind the stereotype of the whore and the opium dealer and forces us to question where the real morality lies. By the novel’s end, every character’s initial presentation has been destabilized. Reader, Catton instructs, don’t judge a book by its cover.

Next year will be the first year in which American authors will be eligible to win the Man Booker Prize, which has previously been open only to authors from the British Commonwealth.

You can take a glimpse at the other books on the 2013 Man Booker Prize longlist and shortlist as well.

This is the byline used for site announcements and for articles by more than one Millions contributor.


  1. I’m always leery when these prize winners are announced. Are the judges of these competitions too quick to use the word “masterpiece” to describe a novel? As individual readers’ tastes vary, I am cautious as to whether or not I am going to jump on the bandwagon until I read a sample of the work.

  2. Even if “masterpiece” is overstating it, why would anyone’s first response to an award to be “leery”? Friends, let us celebrate the good fortune another author has experienced, and then, if we feel we need to, take the time to judge the work ourselves by reading it, before we just spout doubt uninhibitedly.

  3. It’s not that I am not happy for the author who won, it’s just that I have bought so many books that have been overhyped (like last year’s The Art of Fielding) and been greatly disappointed. Many of the superlatives used to describe a new work of fiction are just marketing techniques or misplaced overenthusiasm. The proof of the pudding, as they say, is in the tasting.

Add Your Comment:

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.