Americans Love Poetry, But Not Poetry Books

July 21, 2014 | 11 11 min read


Whether poetry is useless or dead is a question that arrives as regularly as cicadas. Newsweek proclaimed verse a corpse it in 2003; in 2013, The Washington Post’s Alexandra Petri called again for a coffin and a shovel. Still, every spring, ivory towers open their gates and a few thousand new Masters of Poetry stroll out. According to Poets & Writers, there are 204 MFA programs and 21 Creative Writing PhD programs, each graduating a new crop of poets each year. When you add on the countless numbers who write poetry outside of academia, it seems pretty clear that poets aren’t unicornsrather, as in sci fi alien invasion movies, they are already among us: whats interesting is that poetrys popularity is so often called into question. 

People often dismiss poetry by saying it only matters to other poets, but a few minutes spent sifting through the Favorite Poem Project’s online archives proves otherwise; these short documentaries present a wide range of Americanssalesmen, construction workers, bakers, nuns, anthropologists, accountants, Marines, and Bill Clintonreading aloud their favorite poems. To listen to photographer Seph Rodney talk about coming home from a disappointing date to find solace for his loneliness in reading the caustic urgency of Sylvia Plath’sNick and the Candlestickpoem, despite his surprise that this woman from a well-heeled New England familycould speak to me, a man, a Jamaican immigrantyou could hardly get two people in the world more differentis to understand how false the misconception of poetrys irrelevance is. Robert Pinsky, founder of the Favorite Poem Project, stresses that the organizers didnt solicit participants; rather they sent out a call for people to apply to share the poems that moved them. Im very proud that the Favorite Poem Project didnt tell anyone to read poetry; we asked people,said Pinksy, We had no advertising budget so every time I was interviewed as poet laureate, whenever I published anything anywhere, I asked [them] to advertise it. I used to give the cards to cab drivers and we got 18,000 letters from people who wanted to participate and read their favorite poem on camera. Poetry Foundation president Robert Polito offers a similar anecdote to illustrate the value people outside the literary community ascribe to poetry, mentioning how a friend who teaches at a military academy frequently receives letters from former students, soldiers who tell her that the experience of interpreting poems in her class proved the best preparation for the complex and ambiguous circumstances they encountered in Iraq and Afghanistan

Although Americanslove for poetry has yet to reach the wild heights of Abu Dhabis hit reality show Millions Poet where 70 million global viewers watched dueling versifiers vie for a $1.3 million cash prize, Americans are actively involved in reading itparticularly outside the traditional literary arenas of bookstores and libraries. Since 1992, New Yorkers have enjoyed Poetry in Motion,a joint program run by MTA and The Poetry Society of America that showcases poems next to the usual subway car ads for the preternaturally ageless Dr. Zizmors dermatological services and Seamless web food delivery; this past spring, the two-day Poetry in Motion festival in Grand Central Station offered an immensely popular Peanuts-inspired The Poet is Inbooth where poets wrote personalized poems for individual commuters. According to Alice Quinn, PSAs director, People were weeping; one person even asked Will I be able to win my wife back with this poem?’” The Poetry Society of Americas partnership with New York Citys Botanical Gardens also draws hundreds of thousands of visitors each year to wander curated exhibitions pairing Emily Dickinson, Federico Garcia Lorca, and Edna St. Vincent Millay poems with botany. Poets Houses Zoo project, created after the Central Park Zoo asked the nonprofit for help designing on-site installations to evoke an emotional response from zoo-goers the zoo directors felt had been lacking, has proved similarly popular. A study conducted by the Central Park Zoo after the project began showed that significant percentages of zoo-goers felt the poetry enhanced their appreciation of conservation; less than 1% of those surveyed reported disliking the verse.

Thanks to the ease of sharing poems through email and social media, its possible that poetrys audience might be greater now than ever. According to The Academy of American Poets director Jen Benka, the Academys Poem-a-Day has over 300,000 readers, so large an audience that the Hearst Corporation recently partnered with the Academy to include the poems in their online and print newspapers and magazines. Benka points out, The general perception of people who read poetry is not fully accurate. We know there is also a dedicated readershippeople who love poetry who are not poets themselves who are completely dedicated to the art form and take it as seriously as poets doThe only reason Hearst listened to us [for the partnership] was because our Poem-a-Day audience was impressive to them.Robert Polito seconds the importance of technology, pointing out that the Poetry Foundations website receives tens of millions of unique visitors each year. Perhaps the greatest argument for poetrys Internet audience is Patricia Lockwoods poem Rape Jokewhich went viral almost immediately after being published on The Awl in 2014within hours of being posted, the poem had over 10,000 likes on Facebook and was soon fodder for articles on Salon and The Guardian.

But book sales belie this wide readership. While there are the occasional poetry-only bookstores, like Brooklyns Berl’s Poetry Shop, in 2011, New York Magazine compared the numbers for two poetry big-hitters (Wendell Berry and former Poet Laureate Billy Collins) with a book ghostwritten for a 23-year-old who catches a leather ovoid. The result? Berry and Collins sold 2,928 and 18,406, respectively, while Tim Tebows autobiography sold over 282,000 copies within six months. The discrepancy between poetry readership and book sales doesnt matter for nonprofits which rely on generous donors and endowments, but for the independent presses who publish the bulk of modern poetry, sales are a matter of survival. Its not enough to break even with printing costs; presses also need to cover overhead, not to mention pay authors, book designers, and the IRSwith such tight margins, what often gives is editorspaychecks; many independent presses are entirely volunteer-run, with staff putting in long hours on top of their day jobs, personal lives, and their own writing. Low book sales make sense when operating under the commonly accepted fallacy that the primary audience for poetry is other poets, but the challenges independent presses face to stay solvent seem particularly poignant when looking at how extensive poetry’s audience really is.

It should go without saying that no one goes into poetry for money: presses publish poetry because they love it. Although discussions of sales numbers and strategies to increase readership can sound crass, behind the business-speak are editors who want their authors to find a wider audience because they believe in their poems. And paired with this idealism are reasonable practical concerns: unless a press is affiliated with a university (and not always then: lets not forget Eastern Washington University Press, closed by the university in 2010) or funded by a generous donor, book sales are part of a grim equation where low sales not only equals fewer readers to experience the poets work, but also the possibility the press wont have the money to publish new books or stay afloat to keep their current catalog in print. 

While presses naturally want to increase sales, theres also an ambivalence about what that entails, particularly since they have scarce resources and have to make hard decisions about how to allocate their budget and time. Editors want new readers, but not all are actively engaged in cultivating new poetry converts as opposed to focusing on readers who already love poetry. Christopher Janke of Slope Editions says that, [While] we take this issue of general readership very seriously, and we talk of it often…we do not aggressively pursue non-poets/those who arent already readers. It is enough work for our all-volunteer staff simply to edit and publish manuscripts that we find compelling.Gabriel Fried of Persea Books concurs, saying for Persea its [a]n issue of time and money–mostly time. But also money!It makes sense that editors concentrate on what would naturally appear to be the widest pool for sales: the poetry community itself. That said, if editorial resources are small, those of the poets themselves might be even smaller–rare is the poet whose pocket is deep enough to fund as many book purchases as he or she wishes. And, for that matter, even when the intention to buy the book is there, that doesnt guarantee followthrough. Joe Pan, of Brooklyn Arts Press, points out The truth is I’ve seen many people excited for a friend’s book to come out and when it does come out, they don’t buy it. Or they put it off for a later time that never comes

This is where I step out from behind the scrim of journalistic objectivity to admit I co-run an independent press, Augury Books. At Augury, weve taken a twofold approach: attempting both to widen our authorsreadership within the poetry community and to find new poetry readers from outside the community. The largest step weve taken towards finding new poetry readers has simply been to try to broaden our readership in general by publishing other genresshort story collections and creative nonfictionboth as books in our catalog and also as individual pieces in the ad hoc occasional literary journal we run on our website. Our hope is that readers who like the prose we publish may discover, as they poke around our catalog, that they like the poetry too (and vice versa). Weve also made a consistent attempt to have a mix of poets and prose-writersboth those in our catalog and others we dont publish but whose work we loveread at our launch parties and AWP offsite readingsagain hoping that listeners who are there for an author in one genre may find themselves drawn to work they hear in other genres. 

This approach is shared by many presses, including Ugly Duckling Presse. Daniel Owen, one of the collectives editors, notes UDP publishes a number of titles that are not poetry.  The annual Emergency INDEX documents performance, we publish at least one playscript a year through out Emergency Playscript Series, and have been doing more prose latelySo, in a sense, we’re attracting non-poetry readers by publishing things that aren’t poetry.  And readers who are interested in these books might be interested in checking out some poetry books as well.A more idealistic grounding for the strategy of attracting new readers simply by publishing comes from Nate Pritts, of H_NGM_N, who notes Publishing poetry in any form whether stapled sheets of paper or books with spines and national distribution, whether folded pamphlets left on coffee shop tables or online pixels is a strategy for reaching a wider audiencebut follows this with the caveat that sticking with that endeavor, keeping the magazine or press or activity rolling over time, is another strategy.” 

Almost every editor I spoke with listed practical ways to increase sales. These include keeping book costs low, working to widen national and international distribution (both through using distributors like Small Press Distribution and by relying on Internet sales on Amazon), attending book fairs and conferences, sending out review copies, exploring new technology like e-books or smartphone apps (although the development costs sometimes prove prohibitive), and developing relationships with bookstoresall of these strategies keep books within financial and geographic reach of potential buyers, as well as establish the press itself as a recognizably consistent presence in the literary community. Numerous editors also mentioned maintaining a social media presence through email blasts, Facebook posts, Twitter, and Tumblr (although most admitted they delegate these tasks to interns) and almost everyone uniformly pointed out the importance of the poets themselves being involved in the literary community through teaching and giving readings. At Augury, weve found using multiple forms of media such as guest blog posts and radio interviews have helped with salesafter a small local radio show in San Diego interviewed one of our authors, we sold 11 copies of her book within a day. Crowd-sourced fundraisers are also a useful sales platform, as they offer the chance for buyers to receive giveaways like posters and first editions; according to Joe Pan, Brooklyn Arts Press doubled their pre-sales with their recent Kickstarter campaign. 

While these strategies are all useful, they can apply to any genre. Other strategies are more poetry-specific and these strategies oftenmuch as with many of the poetry institutionsput poetry in unexpected places. Wave Books famously rented a bus in 2006 and toured the country, giving readings in places as varied as Seattles Space Needle and the Naval Academy in Annapolis, as well as in galleries, bars, and prisons. Bruce Covey, editor of Coconut Poetry, in his role as chair of the Poetry Council at Emory University, has put poems in elevators, stairwells, shuttle buses, and inside a traveling poetry gumball machine. Cooper Dillon distributes drink coasters emblazoned with poems at local bars. These strategies rely on the idea of if you build it, they will come”—in this case, if poetry is there, people will read it / listen to it.Here, theres just as likely a chance that those who already read poetry will enjoy the reading in the park or the poem on their coaster as much as that a previously non-poetry-reading drinker will see the lines underneath his or her beer and feel moved by them enough to latersoberlytrack down more of the poets work; either way, the hope is that being exposed to the poem will lead to someone buying the book it appears in. 

Some presses rely on technology to maintain ties with readers: Sarabande Books sends out a weekly poem selected by the editors to their email subscription list. Copper Canyon, Omnidawn, YesYes Books, and many others (Augury included) include the option of purchasing books from their back catalog when submitting a manuscript for consideration. Editors stress that purchasing a book wont help the submitted manuscripts chances, but the purchasing option serves as a reminder to prospective authors that its important to be familiar with (and support) the catalog of presses you want to have publish your work. Other editors, such as H_NGM_Ns Nate Pritts and Matthew Zapruder of Wave, mention booking readings at galleries or rock shows as a way of bringing their poets to an audience already interested in visual art or music. Rebecca Wolff, of Fence, has made an active attempt over the years to lure visual arts connoisseurs by advertising in magazines like Art Forum and BOMB, as well as soliciting cover art from visual artists whose work seems to visually match the presss experimental aesthetics. Wolff also occasionally reads poems on her communitys local radio station for National Poetry Month. The appeal of auditory poetry is echoed by poet and critic Stephen Burts exhortation Radio. Almost anything involving radiowhen asked about the most effective strategies to attract new people to poetry, as well as the continued popularity of the NEAs Poetry Out Loud poetry recitation competition which has drawn millions of high school student participants since the program began in 2006, and Black Cake Records, an sort of online poetry album shop. 

Many presses use public service and education as a way to reach out to the wider community. Sarabande Books launched Sarabande Writing Labs this past spring, a program that brings literary arts to traditionally underserved populations; most recently, editor Kristen Miller taught a six-week program to recovering addicts at a local womens shelter. Copper Canyon recently ran a fund-raising campaign to put copies of one of their new titles inside college classrooms and Wave Books sponsors the Bagley Wright Lecture Series, a program that allows poets to present their ideas about poetry in public lectures. Wave also sponsors a biennial festival in Seattle that focuses poetry around other thingstranslation one year; film another. This seems in keeping with the advice offered by the poetry review magazine Coldfront’s Managing Editor Melinda Wilson, who stresses the importance of making launch parties memorable events. Ugly Ducklings Daniel Owen echoes this, saying [w]e like to throw parties. Partiestend to attract people within shouting distance of poetry circles, who might not otherwise be interested.These social events are an effective way to attract active members of the poetry community, lure in those who like parties and might discover they like poetry, and also appeal to poetry-lovers who are not necessarily interested in published poetrythe wide swath of people mentioned by poet Juan Felipe Herrara while discussing the vibrant poetry scene he encounters in multiethnic neighborhoods and communities of color where poetry is presented in fairs and festivals, dance parades and, of course, spoken word and slam competitions. Open-air assemblies.

 [P]oetry is beyond the page,he claims, and so the question is how do we work with it, join it, bring it to our pages?This is the question faced by any independent publisher: how do you bring readers to your pagesreaders who already appreciate poetry but havent yet been exposed to an individual presss catalog, readers whose experience of poetry is auditory or otherwise outside the bookstore, and those readers for whom, as Matthew Zapruder puts it, would find human things in there and be connected to it if they found the right poem for them at the right time. Although the audience for poetry is vast, despite the very hard and creative work being done by publishers, this wider audience hasnt yet crossed the bridge from reading poetry into buying poetry books. This may be somehow tied to poetrys long history as part of a collective oral tradition or it may be another manifestation of our modern tendency to listen to tracks on SoundCloud rather than buy albums and watch shows on Project Free TV instead of paying for HBO and cable. Peoples love for poetry rather than poetry books may also be because of the nature of poetry itself: since each poem is its own complete aesthetic experience, maybe readers feel less inclined to engage with poetry books, no matter how much theyve enjoyed individual poems. There isnt a clear answer for presses about how to unlock this wider audience or even if it can be donejust a multiplicity of different approaches.

Image via richiec/Flickr

’s work has appeared in Indiana Review, Subtropics, Court Green, The Awl, The Hairpin, The Rumpus, Verse Daily, and Best New Poets 2010. She is the recipient of A Room of Her Own Foundation’s “Orlando” Prize, The Southeast Review’s Narrative Nonfiction prize, and an artists residency on the Wildfjords trail in Iceland. A former Writer in Residence at Interlochen Arts Academy, she currently lives in New York where she is a founding editor of Augury Books, serves as the Creative Writing Advisory Board Member for The Mayapple Center for Arts and Humanities, and teaches at Gotham Writers’ Workshop.


  1. It’s worth asking why these interrelated questions (“Is poetry dead?” and “Does poetry matter?”) arise with such regularity. I’ll offer a simple answer to a complicated question, undoubtedly a reductive and insufficient answer, but one that hopefully will get at the point of this article, i.e. that Americans love poetry but don’t buy books of it.

    Americans like poetry, but mostly poetry not written within the last thirty or forty years, around the same point at which most poetry became an exercise in careerist academic obscurantism. It’s instructive that the two examples of poetry sales given in contrast to Tim Tebow’s autobiography (by the way, why exactly is it relevant how many books Tim Tebow sells? Are these competitive markets?) are books by Wendell Berry and Billy Collins, two poets who to my knowledge are anathema to poetry’s intellectual mainstream.

    I have not gone through much of the archive, but my guess is that most of the poems are not the exercises in dry intellectual ambiguity that seem to dominate modern poetry. I realize this comment sounds like populist demagoguery, and I don’t mean to denigrate the entire project of modern poetry–I like, for example, many poems by Robert Hass and Brenda Shaugnessey. But I do think that poetry’s intellectual vanguard largely fails to coherently and meaningfully engage the average reader about their lives, and is more interested instead in a sort of dense opacity, a modernist aesthetic hangover from which poetry has never recovered, although that’s probably a different comment…

  2. I have not gone through much of the archive, but my guess is that most of the poems are not the exercises in dry intellectual ambiguity that seem to dominate the Complete Poems of Emily Dickinson. I realize this comment sounds like populist demagoguery, and I don’t mean to denigrate the entire project of modern poetry–I like, for example, many poems by Robert Hass and Brenda Shaugnessey. But I do think that Emily Dickinson’s intellectual vanguardism largely fails to coherently and meaningfully engage the average reader about their lives, and is more interested instead in a sort of dense opacity, a modernist aesthetic hangover from which poetry has never recovered, although that’s probably a different comment…

  3. Could there be political reasons why people don’t buy poetry books. Most poets are progressive and write for a progressive audience that has little money. Inaugural Poetry:

  4. Poetry will continue to be alive as long as humans still walk the earth. Life is poetical, from the beginning to the ending, everything happens in beautiful rythmn that is predictable. Life begins at birth and ends at death. Always the same characters, same objects, same space, same duration and same seasons. Does anything really change? I don’t think so. Change is a human creation that is facilitated by the mobility of age.

  5. This is NOT about me personally, or my poetry, but to address the subject, I must speak from my own perspective and experiences to explain what I have learned that publishers all seem to have missed.

    I find that the problem is two fold. First, the gap between the man on the street and those who are in charge of what is acceptable as poetry, and second the fact that radio changed everything and publishers missed it.

    The problem is NOT a lack of interest in poetry, but rather a failure on the part of the publishers to understand their prospective customers… let me explain. Poetry has been astronomically successful and growing more so for the last 80 years, but it has followed our culture which has morphed into something nontraditional and has moved away from the structures and forms of academia and into the world of the everyday man. That world is a world where poetry is abundant, and enjoyed daily… in its orated form on the radio.

    Take for example rap music, which has become the dominant genre and which is some of the most powerful, passionate, and emotionally charged poetry in existence… but which would never be considered acceptable by those who think they are something of an authority on poetry. Now compound this shift in where the common man finds his poetry “fix,” by the fact that now poetry is combined with his preferred flavor of music, and you have a medium of choice that a book cannot compare to or compete with… and publishers are in trouble.

    Now, let me share my experiences.

    I have consistently been highly praised for my poetry, and am a preferred poet in my community, for a few very specific reasons. First, my style is not “academic;” which means I write poetry much like the common man speaks, and not based upon a set format of numbered syllables etc. like what is required to be traditionally acceptable. Second, I write what people feel and think, but seldom express, or can even put words to. Third, I am not afraid to express my Christian philosophies… not in a preachy way mind you, but just as a thought. And they love it… even those who are not Christian love my poetry because of its form and substance… and yet I cannot seem to win a single competition that I have entered.

    Perhaps I just suck and the local folks are just being kind to the local wannabe… and that is possible… or perhaps there is a disconnect between what is acceptable for publication academically, and what the common man wants to read. If the last two years have proven anything at all about our culture in the US, it is the extent of the disconnect between the two.

    When I look at what has “won” the competitions I have entered so that I can discover what I failed to do right, or for how I might improve and win publication next time, I find a pattern. What won is consistently from either an established “academia” author, an already published author, is “traditional” in its form, is politically left, politically correct or themed in some way, or is expressing philosophies which are counter traditional cultural perspectives… or is blatantly anti-biblical in its values.

    When I ask others to read what won and give me their opinions of it, they nearly ALWAYS grimace and reject it, and tell me it is garbage and that I should submit mine next time… and THEN I tell them that I did, and was rejected… their chins always drop.

    I said all of that to say this… Our culture, is divided. You have the common man who far outnumbers the academic, and yet the academic determines what is acceptable and what is not. As long as publishers allow academics to determine what is acceptable, it will be rejected by the common man… simply because of the education, style, and vocabulary differences between the cultures.

    And the common man, who begins at 12 years of age, is no longer being taught to appreciate written poetry.

    If I were a publisher today… I would immediately get on the phone and begin calling the music industry’s hottest stars, and start publishing books of their unpublished songs and poems, to their fans, something that has never been done, and that taps into an existing fan/customer base to capitalize upon the existing interest in that poet’s poetry, while simultaneously reprogramming today’s young population to begin seeking, exploring, and appreciating poetry in book form once again.

    But what do I know, I don’t have a college degree. :p

  6. Let me try to clarify on this whole debate “Is Poetry Dead?”. well i compose free verse poetry. i don’t adhere to labels either. what exactly is Magical Realism anyway? just another stamp of faux identity. i am not an academic writer. it frustrates me that i am competing versus bards + poetesses with advanced degrees. i don’t own a MFA in either Creative Writing or Poetry. my words are like the everyman. you can view it for yourselves on my web site. also, there should be more selection for Poetry listings in Barnes & Noble, the actual bookstore. it is a pity that only traditional lit writers are featured there. it sounds like i am complaining but i speak for the countless voiceless poets who are neither noteworthy or accliamed. i hope this cycle changes or at least is confronted by actual people who care about Poetry. Anyhow, i’m off my soapbox now.

    Slightly Distraught,


  7. What you wrote it is 100% right and true. I have 23 inspirational, uplifting poetry e-books and nobody buys them, for I don’t have advanced degree but I express Christian philosophies. I create poetry for common people, to improve their
    thinking about themselves and to see and know better, the inner, invisible, and visible worlds of the cosmos. People like what I write and many are amazed of my simple poetic art, but that is all, no sales of any kind Here I’m giving you the link to my books at

    I’m looking for sponsors or sponsor to publish my books on paper, make audio-books and all in many foreign languages. If they do that, I will give somebody the notary rights to my books, when I die, leaving the material body in due time and will be more books, as long I am here on this earth, and maybe a navel too,
    in Two parts “Child of Darkness” and Children of Light”.I’m not worrying about
    anything, what is it is. I think big to become big with the purpose of helping mankind, to walk the right noble path toward perfection of inner being, as we all
    are, the spirits in flesh. My blessings to you dear loving human beings.

  8. John Boyles… You nailed it!
    Exactly the same conclusions I came to.
    About to publish my first 2 books of poetry, and im like…
    Is poetry even relevant, no publisher wants to touch poetry… I felt like I should not even bother.
    Not even one day later I overhear a comment from a young girl talking with friends, saying how she read some poem, and that normally she would not like poems…but this one, she almost described a religious experience about how it really got into her, it, it was so emotive. She raved about it.
    Poetry is not dead. We writers have progressed and the publishing companies don’t know how to fit them into their outdated formulated ideas about what is and is not acceptable.

Add Your Comment:

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.