Are The Bad Sex Awards… Bad?

By posted at 2:00 pm on December 9, 2012 2

With news of this year’s winner fresh off the press, it’s easy to see how the Literary Review’s “Bad Sex Awards” are an annual delight to many readers (as well as an annual horror to several authors). But are they also counter-productive? As one former “winner” of the award asks, is the Bad Sex Award “anything more than a sort of moral outrage dressed up as a quest for high standards in writing?”

The Millions' future depends on your support. Become a member today!

Share this article

More from the Millions

2 Responses to “Are The Bad Sex Awards… Bad?”

  1. Can Anyone Write Rampant Animal Sex Prose? | The Website of Jim Snowden, Author
    at 5:32 pm on December 9, 2012

    […] response to this year’s Bad Sex Award (given to Nancy Huston’s Infrared), Rick Gekoski at the Guardian proposes a Good Sex Award, […]

  2. James
    at 7:00 pm on December 11, 2012

    Paul Constant of the Stranger has a different critique of the Bad Sex Awards that he’s been repeating; namely, that literary fiction is too sexless as is and this contest supports that.

Post a Response

Comments with unrelated links will be deleted. If you'd like to reach our readers, consider buying an advertisement instead.

Anonymous and pseudonymous comments that do not add to the conversation will be deleted at our discretion.

NEW COMMENTING RULE: Comments may be held for moderation and/or deleted. Whitelisted commenters will see their comments appear immediately. Don't be a jerk. We reserve the right to delete your comment or revoke commenting privileges for any reason we want.