Our own Hannah Gersen writes for Catapult on titling her debut novel, Home Field. As she puts it, “The idea that a title could dissuade a reader was not something I had even considered.” Pair with Bill Morris’s Millions interview with the author.
Working Title
Eat Your Heart Out, Fyre
Planning to attend this Saturday's National Book Festival in Washington, D.C.? The Washington Post has provided five sample itineraries. And for an entirely different, vicarious trip, revisit Mythili G. Rao's account of visiting the Jaipur Literature Festival a few years back: “To voice their disapproval of the circumstances of Salman Rushdie’s absence, four writers read from The Satanic Verses — a book that has been banned in India. They were advised to leave. What kind of real intellectual discussion could go on in a setting that had proved itself so hospitable to self-censorship?”
●
●
Flying Aces
What happens when two magazine writers publish stories on the same topic within a month of each other? We get to read some of the best long-form journalism of the year. Both Esquire's Chris Jones and The Washingtonian's Garrett M. Graff wrote about what it was like to be on Air Force One after the Kennedy assassination. Jones' "The Flight From Dallas" hits 7,600 words, but Graff's "Angel is Airborne" totals 18,000. Save some time to read both because they're equally gripping and uniquely told narratives.
●
●
F. Scott Fitzgerald’s Tax Records
A detailed analysis of F. Scott Fitzgerald's tax records, obtained from his estate, at The American Scholar. William J. Quirk scrutinizes Scott’s financial ledgers from 1919 to 1940, including short story royalties, expenses relating to wife Zelda, and his years spent in Hollywood. Indeed, you are what you spend.
●
●
at once impressionistic and profound
Rohan Maitzen on Virginia Woolf's literary criticism: "What—I can imagine her asking herself, as she writes about other novelists—am I doing, what else can I do, with the novel? Surely figuring this out was always, for her, the underlying project of her criticism."
Is It Now.
With texting and instant messaging perpetually on the rise, the world's punctuation is starting to evolve. At The New Republic, Ben Crair identifies an odd new consequence of this change: the period is now a sign of anger.