Jeff Vandermeer writes for the Los Angeles Times about autobiographical influence in fantasy and sci-fi and argues that “there’s little or no difference in process or results compared to “normal” fiction, except that sometimes you end up with a dragon in your story and sometimes you don’t.” Pair with Alex Trivilino‘s account of “binge-reading” Vandermeer’s Southern Reach trilogy.
College football season is upon us, and I'd be remiss not to highlight the recent flood of fantastic writing on my favorite televised sport. Most striking is Pulitzer Prize-winner Taylor Branch's Atlantic article "The Shame of College Sports." It's accompanied by several other takes on the issue. In regards to academia, this New York Times piece on the University of Chicago's football team demonstrates that tension between educators and football fans is nothing new. (A sentiment the paper illustrated in a 2006 piece on Ivy League football.) However, as Gregg Easterbrook notes, major football programs can also demonstrate success in the classroom as well. Finally, and on a purely emotional level, I will always seize any opportunity to share this fantastic ESPN story by Eric Adelson.
Man Booker Prize-winner Marlon James is finished talking about diversity, and here's part of his logic: "A panel on diversity is like a panel on world peace. It should be seeking a time when we no longer need such panels. It should be a panel actively working towards its own irrelevance. The fact that we’re still having them not only means that we continue to fail, but the false sense of accomplishment in simply having one is deceiving us into thinking that something was tried."
Loudpoet has an interview with former Soft Skull Press publisher Richard Nash about his new social publishing venture Cursor. "“Social” is taking the book and making it much easier to have a conversation with the book and its writer, and have conversations around the book and its writer." Is this a way forward for beleaguered publishers? (via The Lone Gunman)