Recommended: Matthew Monteith’s series of photographs showing people explaining artworks.
“I had put manure bags—yes, manure, which is what we could get—at the front and back doors.” Publishers Weekly looks at how Houston-area indie bookstores are faring post-Harvey.
This essay by Mensah Demary for Electric Literature on Nas and the literary legitimacy of hip-hop is the best thing you'll read this morning. "Nas is a world-class storyteller and practitioner of the narrative form," Demary writes, "I don’t understand why there isn’t more discussion around hip-hop’s literary value among today’s millennial-and-boomer intelligentsia."
Elmore Leonard was a very cinematic writer, yet why are most adaptations of his work so bad? Christopher Orr explores what he calls the "Elmore Leonard paradox" in The Atlantic. "Most of the early adaptations of Leonard’s crime work missed his light authorial touch, opting instead for somber noir." Pair with: Our own Bill Morris's essay on why Leonard was such a good writer.
Los Angeles Review of Books managing editor Evan Kindley reviews Michael Szalay’s Hip Figures: A Literary History of the Democratic Party, and says it “reminds us of a time, not long ago, when literary intellectuals set great store by mainstream political parties, and vice versa.”
"If you read through all the citations, you’ll start to detect certain patterns. Any aspirant Nobel Prize–winner should take note—these may hold the key to victory." The Paris Review has read through all of the Nobel Prize-winner citations and came to a couple of conclusions, such as "you should be great... but it also helps if you’re epic. Oh, and fresh!" Pair their piece with our own overview of newest laureate Patrick Modiano's work, and The New Yorker's look into the translation of Nobel Prize-winning authors.