So does literature really have the power to bring liberals and conservatives together? Probably not. Either way, this is still a fascinating study: "The 'most startling result was this: it was conservative — not liberal — readers who are most active in producing this space of cultural compromise.' Basically, within this sample size, conservative readers tended to exude more generous praise for 'bridge books' and did so with a vernacular considered to be 'less heated or emotional.' Grammatically, they also expressed 'more complex thoughts.'"
Experience "THE POWER OF BOOKS"You know those annoying puzzles where you type in the letters so the computer knows you're not a computer creating a fake account or sending spam? A group from Carnegie Mellon is using these "Captchas" to help digitize books. ReCaptcha is a special type of Captcha that displays words that book digitization software is having trouble deciphering. So, by letting the computer know you're not a computer, you can help some other computers digitize our books.I missed Junot Diaz's appearance at the Free Library of Philadelphia where he read from his new novel The Brief Wondrous Life of Oscar Wao, but Season Evans was there.
Perhaps the best mashup of highbrow and lowbrow to grace the cultural ether in recent years is this innovative scratch-and-sniff guide to becoming a wine expert. The book, which is exactly what you think it is, declares that “not all oaks are created equal” and includes a diagram of “all the smells in the world.” (Related: literary tourism at Suttree’s High Gravity Beer Tavern.)
I can't recommend John Jeremiah Sullivan's 7,000-word article on The Pale King highly enough - not because he gets everything right, but because it's what long-form writing about books should look like: passionate, lucid, wide-ranging, and awfully fun to read. I salute GQ for running it, and hope to see more literary coverage there in the future.