The Great American Novelist

By posted at 10:00 am on July 25, 2012 4

The Guardian‘s Books Blog is hosting a tournament to determine “The Great American Novelist,” and the list of the final 32 seeded contenders, as voted by the site’s readers, is enough to raise some eyebrows—not as much for who did make the cut as for who didn’t. Guardian readers, haven’t you heard of Richard Yates?

The Millions' future depends on your support. Become a member today!

Share this article

More from the Millions

4 Responses to “The Great American Novelist”

  1. ian
    at 10:43 am on July 25, 2012

    Just to be clear – the 32 shortlisted authors were chosen by the guy running the “tournament”. Readers are supposed to vote on the match-ups he has created. There was a discussion about who should be in the 32 but he made the final call.

    Yes, the omission of Yates strikes me as egregious as well, but then the whole idea is pretty silly. Writer matchups (see also: Tournament of Books) are even more ridiculous then prize shortlists.

  2. Gil
    at 10:55 am on July 25, 2012

    What, No Mailer?!!!!!!

  3. nate knapp
    at 2:30 pm on July 25, 2012

    No Fitzgerald, either.

  4. ian
    at 3:28 pm on July 25, 2012

    Mailer (and Capote) were excluded on the basis that their non-fiction is inadmissable. Hence neither has the tournament creator’s required “4 strong novels” to compete thru all the proposed rounds.

    I did say already that it’s a ridiculous exercise….

    Fitzgerald is there, but he’s not a “seed” for some reason.

Post a Response

Comments with unrelated links will be deleted. If you'd like to reach our readers, consider buying an advertisement instead.

Anonymous and pseudonymous comments that do not add to the conversation will be deleted at our discretion.

NEW COMMENTING RULE: Comments may be held for moderation and/or deleted. Whitelisted commenters will see their comments appear immediately. Don't be a jerk. We reserve the right to delete your comment or revoke commenting privileges for any reason we want.