What’s the Value of NaNoWriMo?

By posted at 4:50 pm on November 3, 2010 2

At Salon, Laura Miller protests National Novel Writing Month (a.k.a., NaNoWriMo) and its participants, saying the month-long writing marathon is a waste of time.  At the Los Angeles Times book blog Jacket Copy, Carolyn Kellogg disagrees.

The Millions' future depends on your support. Become a member today!

Share this article

More from the Millions

2 Responses to “What’s the Value of NaNoWriMo?”

  1. Amateurs Ruin Everything! « Odd Lots
    at 9:42 pm on November 3, 2010

    […] {Salon link via The Millions} […]

  2. Imani
    at 2:51 pm on November 4, 2010

    What a dumb response. She did not blame NaNoWriMo for the problem of too few readers & too many writers. No doubt if Kelogg wrote less & read more she’d have better comprehension skills. (Amateur diagnosis.) I couldn’t bother with the rest after that deliberate misinterpretation.

    Basically, Miller thinks the whole venture is neither here nor there but all the fundraising & gala efforts would be better served to bolstering readership rather than the neverending supply of writers that abound. Is that an idea so hard to grasp even if one disagrees? Golly.

Post a Response

Comments with unrelated links will be deleted. If you'd like to reach our readers, consider buying an advertisement instead.

Anonymous and pseudonymous comments that do not add to the conversation will be deleted at our discretion.

NEW COMMENTING RULE: Comments may be held for moderation and/or deleted. Whitelisted commenters will see their comments appear immediately. Don't be a jerk. We reserve the right to delete your comment or revoke commenting privileges for any reason we want.