Publishing’s Gender Gap

By posted at 12:37 pm on September 9, 2010 9

At Guardian, Lionel Shriver (America’s best writer?) shares her frustrations in publishing as a female novelist: “A female novelist would never enjoy a Franzen-scale frenzy of adulation in America…”

The Millions' future depends on your support. Become a member today!

Share this article

More from the Millions

9 Responses to “Publishing’s Gender Gap”

  1. Manny
    at 12:40 pm on September 9, 2010

    Of course she’s right. How can anyone deny this?

  2. akatsuki
    at 12:54 pm on September 9, 2010

    Zadie Smith gets a lot of accolades. So does Margaret Atwood. Hillary Mantel and Jane Gardam too. And that is just off the top of my head.

    Criticizing someone else’s success just sounds bitter and envious.

  3. Seth
    at 1:32 pm on September 9, 2010

    Shriver’s whole article needs to be read, not just the anti-Franzen soundbite – which really does her a disservice. She makes some excellent points about what the real problems are in the bookworld – and it’s not just the NYT.

  4. Manny
    at 3:39 pm on September 9, 2010

    Tall white men speak for everyone; everyone else speaks for themselves.

  5. Emily St. John Mandel
    at 6:55 pm on September 9, 2010

    In all fairness, no one but Franzen enjoys Franzen-scale adulation in the United States. I’m sure the non-Franzen white male novelists of America are just as envious as the rest of us are.

  6. Megan
    at 7:01 pm on September 9, 2010

    Unless she writes for children… I believe J.K. Rowling and Stephanie Meyer have each enjoyed frenzied success.

  7. Kati
    at 9:42 pm on September 10, 2010

    Ujala, I really wish you hadn’t linked it like this. People are apt to not click the link but assume from your blurb that it’s just another female novelist whingeing about her fate when Lionel is actually just talking about how publishers have tried to package her novels and how common it is for female novelists to have the covers of their books not reflect the story within in an attempt to attract readers who only buy books with parasols and pastels on the covers.

    I’m not sure what she was talking about with Rick Moody, though. I don’t think he has universal adulation here, not by a long shot.

  8. Ujala Sehgal
    at 7:47 pm on September 11, 2010

    You make a good point about the way I linked to Lionel Shriver’s article, and one that I put some thought into before I did so. I look through literary websites on a routine basis, and articles consistently appear by female writers expressing their frustration with the publishing industry, the focus almost never being on their success vs. that of male authors, but on the bizarre (and usually pink-colored) packaging that their novels are subjected to. The consistent – and consistently ignored – appearance of these articles suggests that though female writers’ frustration may be justified, it is basically accepted as a fact of life, a double standard that is not particularly interesting to anyone, anymore.

    I may very well be wrong, but I don’t think Shriver’s issues (as stated in her article) regarding the publishing industry were exacerbated by Franzen’s success; it seemed like she mentioned Franzen on purpose. It appeared to me like she was counting on, as Emily St. John Mandel referred to above, the general Franzen-envy, the sensationalism of her statement, to call attention to points that are always made but usually ignored. I chose her piece to link to over others of its kind, and that sentence in particular, because I imagined that while some might criticize her because of it, fewer people would just ignore her entirely, and dismiss what she had to say as the same old banal whining not worthy of even a click.

    I think it is worthy of a click. It is not my intention to weigh in on any side of this debate, but I think the fact that there are several comments above is a very good thing. I think this is an important topic, and thank you to all of you for engaging in it, whichever side you came out on.

  9. Greta
    at 1:22 pm on September 13, 2010

    Hi, Ujala. Enjoyed both the article & the comments–thanks.

    I think publishing is like movies. The people at the top are guessing desperately about what will appeal to their audience 12/18 mos from now–and the truth is they just don’t know. They’re not intentionally trying to hamstring a book with a bad cover (& I know that no one here is suggesting that–I just want to underscore the idea that all the publishers are trying to do is help the novel find its audience). If authors can point to specific examples of successful novels with edgy covers, that might help them get closer to their vision.

    I’m reminded of the stunning success of erotic romance publisher Ellora’s Cave. Raelene Gorlinksy started e-pubbing the books she liked, which weren’t available through major print publishers. Turns out tons of women all over the country wanted to read erotic romance, too. Now the New York houses all have ultra-spicy divisions–but a few romance authors have claimed that when they tried to pitch similar stories in the past, they were turned down by publishing execs who were shocked at the suggestion that romance fans wanted more (& hotter!) sex.

Post a Response

Comments with unrelated links will be deleted. If you'd like to reach our readers, consider buying an advertisement instead.

Anonymous and pseudonymous comments that do not add to the conversation will be deleted at our discretion.

NEW COMMENTING RULE: Comments may be held for moderation and/or deleted. Whitelisted commenters will see their comments appear immediately. Don't be a jerk. We reserve the right to delete your comment or revoke commenting privileges for any reason we want.