Curiosities

Tinkers’ Chain

By posted at 5:11 pm on April 20, 2010 2

At Slate, The Pulitzer win for Tinkers continues to shine a light on what’s broken about the publishing industry right now. “Instead of relying on the Great Chain of Publishing… Tinkers’ chain jumped several links to get to the Pulitzer.” (Thanks, Craig)

The Millions' future depends on your support. Become a member today!




Share this article

More from the Millions

2 Responses to “Tinkers’ Chain”

  1. Edan Lepucki
    at 7:40 pm on April 20, 2010

    This is the stupidest article I’ve read in a long time.

  2. Emily St. John Mandel
    at 9:49 am on April 25, 2010

    What an odd piece. The first link in the Great Chain of Publishing is news to me — I wonder if the writer is aware that not all novelists come out of MFA programs, and I’m not sure I entirely understand why it would be a tragedy if that clubby chain, as she describes it, breaks. And has she really not read any novels in the last few years that have changed the way she sees the world? I could offer a list of reading suggestions, but she’s probably better off going to an independent bookseller for that.

Post a Response

Comments with unrelated links will be deleted. If you'd like to reach our readers, consider buying an advertisement instead.

Anonymous and pseudonymous comments that do not add to the conversation will be deleted at our discretion.

NEW COMMENTING RULE: Comments may be held for moderation and/or deleted. Whitelisted commenters will see their comments appear immediately. Don't be a jerk. We reserve the right to delete your comment or revoke commenting privileges for any reason we want.