Essays

My Biographer Will Be Pleased: Thoughts on Personal Papers

By posted at 6:50 am on February 19, 2010 8

coverI am moving back in with my father.  It’s only temporary–a month at most, or two.  This return to the nest is a byproduct (and benefit) of living in the same city as my parents, and it seems I do it every few years, when I’m at the end of one phase of my life, and about to start another: before and after college, for example, and before and after graduate school.  This time, it’s a new beginning for Patrick, who is bidding adieu to Vroman’s Bookstore, and taking a job at goodreads. (I hope that this will be a phase for me too: my  Before-I-Sell-A-Book phase, which implies, of course, that there will be an After-I-Sell-My-Book Phase.  One can dream, pray, beg, and revise like hell, right?)

Because Patrick and I knew we would move within the year–new job or not–we purged our library, which I documented here.  This week, we’ve dedicated ourselves to purging and organizing our papers.  I realize now that, while I don’t hold much attachment to objects, photos, and old clothing, I have trouble letting go of…text.  I resisted getting rid of my books–all those stories and characters and sentences!–and that same resistance returned when it came time to purge old letters, college essays, birthday cards and journals–all those stories and characters and sentences!  In fact, my resistance never waned; whereas I easily shipped off half of my library, I am keeping most of these personal papers.  Instead of discarding, I filed.

I devoted an entire file to a poet friend; if I could, I’d give her letters a whole room, an entire castle.  In 2004 she wrote, “My job is boring, my heart aches, and I have growing affection for a group of 12-year-old boys who think of me only on Thursday evenings, when I become an easy target for jokes in a language I cannot speak.  Maybe this enough. Maybe this is a life.”  In 2009 she tells me:  “The mackerel are running right now, so the porpoises are out there, too.  If I could, I’d sit out there all day, watching the fog burn and settle, burn and settle, watching the ghost ships gain bulk then lose it.   Alas, there is a world to inhabit!”

In his essay “Incomparable Naturalism,” Philip Hensher writes that Anton Chekhov’s short story endings suggest “a sense that life has been glimpsed here, and not glimpsed fully.”  Reading my friend’s letters makes me feel the same way, as if, in these brief missives, I’m witnessing a glimmer of her full, glimmering life.  Hensher also writes, “Chekhov’s world is, supremely, a world of things.”  Perhaps because I’m moving, my world feels like this as well right now; is that why the watermelon-eating moment in “The Lady with the Dog” moves me so?  I am so focused on things these days, of discarding them, packing them, transporting them.  And my books and these old papers and letters–these say the most about my life than anything, any thing, could.

There’s this, too:  In one old folder, I discovered a final evaluation letter from Dan Chaon, from whom I took a Fiction Workshop during my junior year at Oberlin.  He wrote:  “…my biggest concern is that there is a gap between the polish that you bring to your work and the level of emotional complexity that you are allowing into your stories.”    He urges me to not to spend the winter break further revising the stories I’ve already written, but to devote my time “thinking about your demons and plunging into the stuff that’s more scary and disturbing and difficult for you.”   This passage, nearly ten years later, hit me in the depths of my soul.  Have I followed his instructions?  It’s strong advice for a twenty-year-old who likes pretty sentences, and I can hear myself echoing it to my own students when I tell them to write through it, to use language not to detach, but to dive into the thickets of a story.  I have endeavored to follow Dan’s advice, but I don’t know if I have always succeeded.  The letter went into another file–one for drafts of my work, and responses to it from teachers, classmates, and friends.  (There is a file, too, for my rejections, and a much thinner one, for my acceptances.  Such is the life of a writer.)

Dan’s advice obviously affected me.  It might help explain a letter from my grandmother, where she thanks me for sending her a copy of my first published story.  She writes that my work is “dark and gloomy,” and adds, “I guess you would find me hopelessly old fashioned to like happy stories.”  This, along her many poems, went into my file of family correspondence.  There I now keep a number of cards from my father who is incredibly sentimental; he himself keeps everything my sisters and I have ever written him.  I can almost see him, penning the bon voyage card he wrote to me when I left for graduate school; he knows I will keep it for years to come.  “You’ll do well,” he writes.  “You have been teaching since 609 [our old address number] when your class was your stuffed menagerie.”  He wrote just the thing to ensure that I would never throw it away.  In another letter, he hopes he will one day read of a great dad in my fiction, and know that it’s him I’m describing.  Reading this, I felt a twinge of sorrow;  in my first novel, at least, the father isn’t good.  It’s fiction–but still, might he misread it as biography?   These cards from him, they’re proof of something I haven’t yet been able to translate into story.

coverReading these old papers, I want to visit the work of Stuart Dybek, with his tales of childhood in Chicago.  I want to re-read Lynda Barry’s What it Is, and do her writing exercises that ask you to make images with language, to remember; I want to pull from my memory the first ten cars I rode in; I want to remember other people’s mothers.  I want to return to the past.

The most treasured part of my correspondence takes up four files.  Two are for letters from me, to Patrick; the other two are from him, to me.  We began as co-workers, and then, when I went back to school, we were pen pals.  Eventually, we lived in the same city again, and we became more than friends.  If our relationship were a novel, it would be an epistolary one. Every year I write Patrick a love letter on Valentine’s Day, and they are all saved.  I imagine some day, we will read them aloud to one another, and they will bring us back: to that large apartment in loud, parking-less Koreatown, to our low-ceilinged tree house in Iowa, and to the place we are currently packing up, and saying goodbye to.

Organizing these papers reminds me to save what matters, and, certainly, to put my thoughts, my gratitude, and my affection, in writing.  If I send you something, please keep it.

Bonus Link: Linked by Words: Uncovering a Piece of Family History

[Image credit: Kevin Walsh]

The Millions' future depends on your support. Become a member today!




Share this article

More from the Millions

8 Responses to “My Biographer Will Be Pleased: Thoughts on Personal Papers”

  1. Gwen H
    at 2:10 am on February 20, 2010

    I just read “The Lady with the Pet Dog” in my English class! We talked about the story, and the watermelon-eating moment, yesterday. It really is wonderful.

  2. april
    at 1:40 pm on February 20, 2010

    You’ve inspired me to file! Being a writer myelf, I also have boxes and boxes of story notes & correspondence. Thanks for this! Great writing, by the way.

  3. Emily St. John Mandel
    at 4:02 pm on February 20, 2010

    I love this essay. I don’t have an enormous amount of stuff, having gotten rid of everything in order to move across borders with suitcases a couple times in my early twenties, but I do have enormous amounts of paper — old notes, old letters, diary entries on looseleaf paper. I find it almost impossible to throw any of it away.

  4. Diana Raab
    at 10:25 am on February 21, 2010

    Great essay! How true that it’s a difficult deciding what to keep and what to toss. As a journaling advocate and journaling instructor, i tell my students not to rip out of their journals and not to throw any papers away because you just never know when you want to look back and read how you were feeling. When it comes down to extra baggage, in reality, it does not add up to much! You might want to check out my latest book, ‘Writers and Their Notebooks,’ which addresses many of the issues in this article.

    Happy writing!
    Diana

  5. cecil
    at 5:34 pm on February 22, 2010

    I love this essay about the wonderfulness of letters (and other ephemera) that are of a certain time. Thanks for reminding me that I need to organize my correspondence and move them from the various shoe boxes I keep them in.

    And for sures I will save any and all letters from you, and others, both dear and not dear. For both the good, the warm, the bad, the painful, the sweet and the sour make for the more whole picture.

  6. mike mccullough
    at 10:09 am on February 23, 2010

    two words–> google docs!. I just put everything in there now. but of course I keep the hard copies too so idk what I’m really saying here. haha

  7. Edan Lepucki
    at 2:42 pm on February 24, 2010

    Thanks everyone, for your thoughts and feedback. Mike, I worry about Google Docs, for who knows what might happen to it–could disappear in an instant. And, yes, you’re right, you still need those hard copies!

  8. Joelle Biele
    at 10:15 am on March 7, 2010

    Yes! Save your papers! I’ve spent a lot of time in archives doing research–it’s ALL important

Post a Response

Comments with unrelated links will be deleted. If you'd like to reach our readers, consider buying an advertisement instead.

Anonymous and pseudonymous comments that do not add to the conversation will be deleted at our discretion.

NEW COMMENTING RULE: Comments may be held for moderation and/or deleted. Whitelisted commenters will see their comments appear immediately. Don't be a jerk. We reserve the right to delete your comment or revoke commenting privileges for any reason we want.