Two years ago Philadelphia based writer Meredith Broussard decided to do just this. She put together an anthology of stories about relationships gone wrong: 26 of them – arranged alphabetically – by various female authors. The result was The Dictionary of Failed Relationships, which includes stories by Heidi Julavits, Anna Maxted, Thisbe Nissen and Jennifer Weiner. Now Broussard is back with a follow up anthology from the men’s point of view – again, 26 stories about love troubles arranged alphabetically – called The Encyclopedia of Exes with stories by, among others, Adam Langer, Jonathan Lethem, Jonathan Ames, Gary Shteyngart and Neal Pollack. Tou can find out more about both books at failedrelationships.com.
I was looking at the list of "Top 10 Most Irritating Expressions in the English language," which was linked to in our recent Curiosities installment (and which is culled from a new book, A Damp Squid: The English Language Laid Bare), and a thought occurred to me. The Millions has been around for nearly six years. Over our exactly 1,800 posts (not including this one), just how annoying have we been?Hoping for the best, but fearing the worst, I performed some searches. Here's what I found:At the end of the day - We've used this clunker just three times, including way back in 2004 when it crept into a post called "Books of the Boom". In my defense, I was referring to an actual day, and not the hypothetical one that is the target of those Oxford wordsmiths' ire.Fairly unique - I'd never thought about it, but that is a fairly silly phrase. Thankfully, we've never used it at The Millions.I personally - Another redundancy, and this time I am guilty. I've used it twice, though not since 2004 when it crept into this roundup. I blame Kakutani.At this moment in time - That one hurts my ears, and indeed it has thankfully never made it into print at The Millions.With all due respect - A classic, used but once in 1,800 posts. The guilty party is Garth who was clearly struck briefly mad by a slight against his beloved Bolaño.Absolutely - This one, in that it is not a phrase, strikes me as a bit unfair, pernicious as this adverb may be. We've used it 41 times over the years, and I feel absolutely no guilt about that.It's a nightmare - No nightmares here.Shouldn't of - That's just bad grammar, and we've never used it. Phrases like that keep us up at night.24/7 - We've used this one twice. Contributor emeritus Patrick gets a pass because he used it as part of this phrase: "24/7 mingle mode." I can think of no better way to describe BEA in LA.It's not rocket science - we've never used this one, but "rocket science" was used in one of my all-time favorite Millions posts, Andrew's "Distinguished in a David Niven Mustache."
The holidays are nearly upon us, and longtime Millions reader Laurie wrote in to share a number of ways to give back with books this year.Room to Read works in developing countries with low literacy rates to create kids books in local languages using local writers and artists.A Peace Corps rep asks for books in Honduras.Laurie also adds: "Our local B&N is conducting a book drive to put new books into the hands of local kids who would otherwise not have any to call their own. B&N will only accept books bought in the store, though (or, one clerk told me, 'possibly books that look new if you can show a receipt for them'). I understand the need to provide a poor kid something new, not a 'hand-me-down,' but this approach is so self-serving it detracts from the charitable aspect. Then again, it puts more new books in the hands of kids who have none in their homes, so maybe turning charity into a for-profit business tactic isn't totally evil? Or maybe donating to a nonprofit like First Book is a better choice."Here are more links to nonprofit book charities:Directory of Book Donation ProgramsBring Me a BookEthiopia Reads